This piece of Thoreau’s writing was bit obscure
and hard for me to grasp fully, but I think that in terms of responsibilities
and relationship, he has two main things to say: simplicity and reality.
Thoreau seems to prefer to live a life not of delusions and distractions, but
rather a life stripped of trivial specificities and details that many are so
consumed with. Severing our wants and perhaps even needs to stick to a comfort
zone of regularity and routine, we should instead view life with certain
alacrity that will take us farther in life. Life was not given to us so that we
can spend most of it in an illusionary perspective, and Thoreau seems to want us
to shake off any burdens of frequent changes and fluctuations in our lives that
may weigh us down, and instead focus on viewing this world with an accuracy
that will stress reality. Relationships and responsibilities have a certain limit
in this lifestyle, as I think that Thoreau thinks that both of them require/have
a certain degree of specific concerns and vague uncertainty that we can’t
figure out immediately. Instead of being absorbed with the many connections and
obligations that we may have with either people or objects, we should attempt
to have equanimity in everything so that we won’t get swept away by concerns
and instabilities. I disagree with Thoreau, partly perhaps because I didn’t
really understand him, and partly because I think that we should delve into
every detail and change in life. I admit that Thoreau is right on how we mustn’t
choose to withdraw into a shell of false protection, but I don’t think that in
order to live a life based on reality, we need to choose simplicity.
No comments:
Post a Comment