Quindlen wants us to disregard the expectations
of society. McCandless wanted to find himself and discover happiness and
fulfillment in life. Thoreau wants to live a life devoid of illusions and
instead based on a foundation of perspicuity and simple reality. They all
agreed on how relationships should have a priority on oneself; instead of
living a life in which we chase after others and are concerned with how people
and the world views and relates with us, we need to first get ourselves
together in terms of accurate self-awareness and acceptance.
I agree with all three of them to a certain
extent. I agree with Quindlen on how we mustn’t be caught up in worrying about
whether we meet the expectations of others. Her stance on how we should all
pursue a life centered on our contentment and happiness appealed to me because I
also think that we shouldn’t shoulder the burden of perfection and
expectations, and instead should learn to live to be happy with who we are and
what we want. I agree with McCandless on how we mustn’t be caught up with the
limits of life and that we should strive to surpass them if we want too. Life
isn’t about comfort and conformity; dreams are meant to be pursued, goals are
meant to be attempted, and desires are meant to be achieved. I agree with
Thoreau on how we mustn’t be blind to reality and that we should come to face
ourselves and the life that we’re leading now with an unbiased perspective that
isn’t so carried away with the insignificant details of life. But I also think
that all three of these perspectives are to be true within reason.
Relationships and responsibilities are both things that I value and regard very
highly, and I think that there are times when they will come first before my
own shallow desires. These three people all seem to value the idea of
self-priority, individualism, and reality; responsibilities and relationships
may be perceived as equally important, but they seem to fall in somewhere
beneath the three; this, I do not agree.
No comments:
Post a Comment